
Delhi High Court units apart denial of untimely launch in 1993 hijacking case
The High Court noticed that the Sentence Review Board’s reasoning fell wanting the requirements of justification required from an government authority exercising an administrative perform. File | Photo Credit: The Hindu
The courtroom remanded the matter again to the SRB for contemporary consideration and directed the board to concern a choice inside eight weeks.
“It is clear that the impugned determination of the SRB suffers from inadequacy of reasoning and non-consideration of related supplies, together with judicial observations bearing upon the petitioner’s conduct and reformation. Thus, the mentioned determination can’t be sustained,” the High Court acknowledged in its order dated July 7.
The courtroom famous that the conduct of convict Hari Singh throughout his incarceration mirrored components of reformation.
Singh was convicted by the trial courtroom in 2001. His conviction was upheld by the High Court in 2011, and a subsequent attraction earlier than the Supreme Court was later withdrawn.
According to Singh, his identify was periodically taken up for consideration of untimely launch earlier than the SRB, however was persistently rejected on account of the gravity of the offence.
As of May 12, Singh had accomplished 17 years, 11 months, and 6 days of precise imprisonment, and a complete of twenty-two years, six months, and 20 days together with remission.
The courtroom noticed that the SRB’s reasoning fell wanting the requirements of justification required from an government authority exercising an administrative perform.
“Petitioner’s conduct in jail does point out components of reformation, as even over an extended interval of incarceration (nearly 18 years of precise imprisonment), there isn’t a file of any untoward incident which might point out that the petitioner nonetheless harbours components of criminality,” the courtroom mentioned.
Published – July 26, 2025 10:39 pm IST
No Comment! Be the first one.