Jun 25, 2025 06:18 AM IST

A bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Okay Vinod Chandran requested the officer to give up inside a interval of two weeks.

The Supreme Court refused to grant reduction to a military officer who has been charged with the homicide of his spouse in a case of dowry loss of life.

The military officer had moved the highest court docket towards the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s choice denying him reduction.(HT photograph)

While rejecting the military officer’s plea urging safety from arrest, a bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Okay Vinod Chandran requested him to give up inside a interval of two weeks, in response to ANI information company. 

The military officer had moved the highest court docket towards the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s choice denying him reduction.

While passing the order, the court docket stated that an ‘exemption from give up’ was solely allowed in instances involving much less severe offences, in contrast to the fees that the military officer had been accused of.

Breaking NEWS:  Air India crash probe panel set to satisfy right this moment

During the listening to, the bench famous that the truth that the convict was a military officer solely confirmed he was match and able to having strangulated his spouse to loss of life, as per ANI. After listening to the counsels’ arguments, the court docket agreed to situation a discover to the respondent State of Punjab, whereas denying the military officer’s enchantment.

SC says serving in Operation Sindoor no assure of immunity

The high court docket, whereas passing the judgment within the case, stated that participation in ‘Operation Sindoor’ doesn’t give the officer immunity to commit atrocities at house. The court docket’s commentary got here after the defence counsel highlighted the convict’s position as a black cat commando within the Indian Army, who had served throughout ‘Operation Sindoor’.

The accused had been beforehand convicted by a Punjab court docket for committing dowry loss of life underneath part 304B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), following which he appealed towards the choice within the Punjab and Haryana HC. 

Breaking NEWS:  India rejects Pakistan's claims on blast in Balochistan's Khuzdar, calls allegations baseless

The HC suspended his sentence, till his enchantment stood pending, after he had served three years in jail. However, the HC final month rejected his enchantment, upholding his conviction and handing him ten years of imprisonment.