John Spencer, the defence professional, uncovered Pakistan’s over-reliance on Chinese weapons, saying that Islamabad “continues to rely closely on Chinese-made techniques just like the HQ-9/P, LY-80, and FM-90—techniques that repeatedly fail to cease or detect precision strikes.

New Delhi:

India’s Operation Sindoor introduced success for the nation not simply on the battlefield, whereas additionally proving its technological superiority towards Chinese weaponry utilized by Pakistan, says John Spencer, one of many main defence specialists on the planet. He burdened that, together with sending a strategic message, Operation Sindoor additionally revealed a tactical reality: India’s domestically produced weapons labored, and China’s didn’t.

In an article written on X, Spencer recommended that whereas India defeated Pakistan on the battlefield, it additionally uncovered Chinese weaponry, successful the know-how referendum.

India used sovereign arsenal: Spencer

In response to Pakistan’s aggression, Spencer provides India used “sovereign arsenal built under the twin doctrines of Make in India and Atmanirbhar Bharat”.

John Spencer writes, “Operation Sindoor pitted India’s indigenously developed weapons systems against Chinese-supplied platforms fielded by Pakistan. And India didn’t just win on the battlefield—it won the technology referendum. What unfolded was not just retaliation but the strategic debut of a sovereign arsenal built under the twin doctrines of Make in India and Atmanirbhar Bharat.”

He hailed India’s rising self-reliance in defence, saying, “It has led to a major leap in indigenous production—from 32% of the Army’s ammunition needs met domestically in 2014 to 88% in 2024.”

Expert hails Indian weaponry

“From missiles like BrahMos and Pinaka to radars and artillery systems, Indian-made equipment proved itself in live combat. That’s not just a national achievement—it’s a model of military readiness for any nation facing modern threats,” he added.

The defence professional uncovered Pakistan’s over-reliance on Chinese weapons, saying that Islamabad “continues to rely heavily on Chinese-made systems like the HQ-9/P, LY-80, and FM-90—systems that repeatedly fail to stop or detect precision strikes. In a real fight, performance matters more than procurement deals.”

Operation Sindoor

India launched Operation Sindoor within the wake of the Pahalgam terrorist assault that claimed 26 harmless lives. The Indian Armed Forces focused terror infrastructure inside Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.

The main motion came about between the 2 sides on the intervening evening of May Ninth-Tenth and continued until the afternoon of May Tenth, whereby air bases alongside the size and breadth of Pakistan had been focused by India.

After India had attacked terror bases in Pakistan on the evening of May Sixth-Seventh, together with the fear hubs in Bahawalpur and Muridke in Pakistani Punjab, the Pakistani facet retaliated by firing missiles at navy targets in India, which didn’t go away a mark as a result of a robust multi-tier air defence system.

IAF destroyed Pakistan’s navy property

The Indian Air Force on May Ninth went into aggressive mode by destroying the command and management (C2) centres of the Pakistan Air Force on the Chaklala, Sargodha and Murid air bases.

The Pakistani airbase in Bholari was focused at a hangar which housed a Saab 200 AEW&C airborne radar and surveillance plane together with not less than 3-4 Western-origin fighter plane of the Pakistan Air Force.

The assaults towards the Pakistani Air Force have taken them not less than 5 years again and triggered nice harm to them and their Chinese and Turkish stock of weapons, which couldn’t stand even towards classic Pechora and OSA-AK Russian-origin air defence techniques.

(With company inputs)