Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs, second from left, watches from the protection desk as Judge Arun Subramanian speaks to the jury in Manhattan federal court docket, Tuesday, July 1, 2025, in New York.(Elizabeth Williams through AP)
Prosecutors, Combs’ protection staff and Judge Arun Subramanian reasoned that after simply two days of deliberations, it was too quickly to surrender on reaching a verdict on all counts. So relatively than taking a partial verdict, Subramanian instructed the jury to proceed weighing the remaining cost. Deliberations will proceed Wednesday.
The developments got here late Tuesday afternoon, when the jury despatched a notice saying it was unable to succeed in a unanimous verdict on the racketeering conspiracy cost as a result of there have been jurors with “unpersuadable views” on either side.
After listening to in regards to the notice, Combs appeared morose as his legal professionals defined to him what was taking place, at one level solemnly studying a chunk of paper that lawyer Marc Agnifilo handed to him. The hip-hop mogul ‘s mom and several other of his kids returned to the courtroom.
After the jury got here in for directions after which exited the room, a subdued Combs sat in his chair for a couple of minutes. As he stood to depart, he confronted his household and supporters, blew a kiss and tapped his coronary heart, as he often has executed at the beginning and finish of every day.
Then he paused earlier than his mom and exchanged a number of phrases, telling her, “Love you” and “I’ll be all proper.”
Marshals then led him from the room.
Jurors are weighing expenses that Combs used his fame, wealth and violence to pressure two girlfriends into drug-fueled intercourse marathons with male intercourse staff referred to as “freak-offs” or “resort nights.”
He has pleaded not responsible, and his legal professionals contend prosecutors try to criminalize Combs’ swinger life-style and that, if something, his conduct amounted to home violence, not federal felonies.
Combs, 55, may face 15 years in jail to life behind bars if he’s convicted of all expenses.
Racketeering conspiracy
Racketeering conspiracy — rely 1 on the jury’s verdict sheet — is essentially the most difficult cost as a result of it requires the jury to resolve not solely whether or not he ran a “racketeering enterprise,” but in addition whether or not he was concerned in committing some or all of assorted kinds of offenses, similar to kidnapping and arson.
The cost falls below the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, finest identified for being utilized in organized crime and drug cartel instances.
Earlier Tuesday, the jury requested to overview crucial testimony from one of many prosecution’s most necessary witnesses: the hip-hop mogul’s former longtime girlfriend Cassie Ventura, the R&B singer born Casandra Ventura.
The panel of eight males and 4 ladies requested for Cassie’s account of Combs beating, kicking and dragging her at a Los Angeles resort in 2016 — an assault captured on now-infamous safety digital camera footage.
They additionally requested to see Cassie’s testimony about when she mentioned Combs accused her of taking medication from him and kicked her off their yacht on the Cannes Film Festival in France in 2013. On their approach again to the U.S., she mentioned, he threatened to launch specific movies of her having intercourse.
In addition, the jury requested for Cassie and stripper Daniel Phillip’s testimony about her leaping into his lap at a New York City resort after. Phillip testified that he suspected Combs had been slapping and slamming her round an adjoining room.
“Her entire total physique was shaking, like she was terrified,” mentioned Phillip, who was on the resort for a sexual encounter with Cassie someday between 2012 and 2014.
Phillip testified that he instructed her she was in actual hazard. Cassie, he mentioned, “principally tried to persuade me that it was OK: ‘It’s OK. I’m advantageous, I’ll be OK.’”
Tuesday’s court docket session started with the legal professionals and decide contemplating the jury’s request late Monday for clarification about what qualifies as drug distribution, a side of the racketeering conspiracy cost.
Subramanian in the end reminded jurors of directions he’d already given on that a part of the case.
On Monday, the panel deliberated over 5 hours. Barely an hour into the closed-door dialogue, the foreperson despatched a notice complaining that there was one juror “who we’re involved can not comply with your Honor’s directions.”
The decide responded to that first notice by reminding jurors of their duties to deliberate and their obligation to comply with his directions on the legislation.
At the trial, Combs selected to not testify as his legal professionals constructed their arguments for acquittal largely by means of prolonged cross-examinations of dozens of prosecution witnesses.
No Comment! Be the first one.